Comments on: Content vs SEO – Which Will Win? (The Answer May Surprise You) http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/ Blog Consulting and Design Services and Training Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:15:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: air jordan 17 http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-103429 air jordan 17 Fri, 28 May 2010 07:13:59 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-103429 Nice going!Is wonderful? Nice going!Is wonderful?

]]> By: Michael Martine http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100436 Michael Martine Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:54:57 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100436 Great content gets backlinks naturally. If it doesn't, it's not great <em>enough</em>. Only a little push at the beginning gets the ball rolling. Consistent great content gets subscribers, which creates an army of backlinkers as soon as new content is published. Great content gets backlinks naturally. If it doesn’t, it’s not great enough. Only a little push at the beginning gets the ball rolling. Consistent great content gets subscribers, which creates an army of backlinkers as soon as new content is published.

]]> By: Stan The Man http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100434 Stan The Man Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:27:23 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100434 I knew you would say that :) Me, I prefer backlinks. I can rank anything with the right links, but I can't rank great content without backlinks. Though is debatable, I think I would choose backlinks over content. I knew you would say that :)
Me, I prefer backlinks. I can rank anything with the right links, but I can’t rank great content without backlinks. Though is debatable, I think I would choose backlinks over content.

]]> By: Michael Martine http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100431 Michael Martine Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:01:39 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100431 Content, every time. :) Content, every time. :)

]]> By: Stan The Man http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100425 Stan The Man Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:45:16 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100425 Hi Michael, Thanks for the reply, I thought I was missing something. Now it makes sense. Would be interesting to read something like: Content or backlinks? What would you chose, if you have to choose on of these? Hi Michael,
Thanks for the reply, I thought I was missing something. Now it makes sense. Would be interesting to read something like: Content or backlinks? What would you chose, if you have to choose on of these?

]]> By: Michael Martine http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100417 Michael Martine Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:35:20 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100417 Scott, thanks for your comment. It was great to meet you at BlogWorld (well, before it, actually). Look forward to meeting you again in the future. :) Scott, thanks for your comment. It was great to meet you at BlogWorld (well, before it, actually). Look forward to meeting you again in the future. :)

]]> By: scott penton http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100416 scott penton Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:32:39 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100416 Agree about content vs. SEO, you really need both. Nice meeting you too at the tweet up before bwe09 at the Monty Carlo. Take care Agree about content vs. SEO, you really need both. Nice meeting you too at the tweet up before bwe09 at the Monty Carlo. Take care

]]> By: Michael Martine http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100403 Michael Martine Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:23:20 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100403 Stan, it seems people want to make this issue into an "either/or" situation. Because so many people (wrongly) believe that, I'm essentially baiting them with a provocative title. If I just wrote: "There is no difference between content and SEO" as a headline, nobody would be interested. You should use related words in your title, of course, but you would be amazed at the number of people who don't. I've seen blogs that are supposedly about a particular subject, and not seen that subject mentioned by name <em>anywhere</em> on the page. Stan, it seems people want to make this issue into an “either/or” situation. Because so many people (wrongly) believe that, I’m essentially baiting them with a provocative title. If I just wrote: “There is no difference between content and SEO” as a headline, nobody would be interested.

You should use related words in your title, of course, but you would be amazed at the number of people who don’t. I’ve seen blogs that are supposedly about a particular subject, and not seen that subject mentioned by name anywhere on the page.

]]> By: Stan The Man http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100402 Stan The Man Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:51:37 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100402 I am not sure I understand the title here. What do you mean by that? When you write something, don't you consider a title, don't you use a few related words in that title? Don't you link internally using that title and keywords? Isn't that SEO? So both work together, you don't choose one over the other! I am not sure I understand the title here. What do you mean by that? When you write something, don’t you consider a title, don’t you use a few related words in that title? Don’t you link internally using that title and keywords? Isn’t that SEO?
So both work together, you don’t choose one over the other!

]]> By: Michael Martine http://remarkablogger.com/2009/09/21/content-vs-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-100389 Michael Martine Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:48:45 +0000 http://remarkablogger.com/?p=3479#comment-100389 Dave, yes, age can matter a great deal when it comes to this. Ranking #1 for keywords only matters if there are enough searches on those keywords to matter. It's easy to rank for worthless keywords. I'm not saying that's what you're doing, I only mention it because your comment reminded me this is a "DIY SEO" issue. Dave, yes, age can matter a great deal when it comes to this. Ranking #1 for keywords only matters if there are enough searches on those keywords to matter. It’s easy to rank for worthless keywords. I’m not saying that’s what you’re doing, I only mention it because your comment reminded me this is a “DIY SEO” issue.

]]>