<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Ethics 101c &#8211; The Accidental Disclosure Manifesto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/</link>
	<description>Blog Coaching &#38; Consulting Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Barnhart</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-98578</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Barnhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 13:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-98578</guid>
		<description>Excluding twitter for the moment, why not use an existing paradigm to deal with affiliate links - semantically as microformats?. Something as simple as rel=&quot;affiliate&quot; might be sufficient. A more complex microformat might identify the advertiser or network (a la rel=&quot;license&quot; microformatâ€).

This way, the small percentage of people who may be concerned can download the inevitable plugin if needed, management and links to privacy and disclosure pages automated, etc. Of course, the real drivers of this may need to the actual affiliate programs - if CJ for example put this in their auto code generation tool.

As for Twitter, the major URL shorteners like BudURL could simply set up a complementary domain for affiliate/sponsored links and maintain the disclosure on their site via a link preview function. Again, it would help if Twitter then autotagged the URL.

A modest proposal, at least. And requires no one elseâ€™s permission to start!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excluding twitter for the moment, why not use an existing paradigm to deal with affiliate links &#8211; semantically as microformats?. Something as simple as rel=&#8221;affiliate&#8221; might be sufficient. A more complex microformat might identify the advertiser or network (a la rel=&#8221;license&#8221; microformatâ€).</p>
<p>This way, the small percentage of people who may be concerned can download the inevitable plugin if needed, management and links to privacy and disclosure pages automated, etc. Of course, the real drivers of this may need to the actual affiliate programs &#8211; if CJ for example put this in their auto code generation tool.</p>
<p>As for Twitter, the major URL shorteners like BudURL could simply set up a complementary domain for affiliate/sponsored links and maintain the disclosure on their site via a link preview function. Again, it would help if Twitter then autotagged the URL.</p>
<p>A modest proposal, at least. And requires no one elseâ€™s permission to start!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask the experts: Links to affiliate mastery &#124; Strip Blogging</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86692</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask the experts: Links to affiliate mastery &#124; Strip Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86692</guid>
		<description>[...]  Blogging Ethics 101c - The Accidental Disclosure Manifesto-Remarkablogger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Blogging Ethics 101c &#8211; The Accidental Disclosure Manifesto-Remarkablogger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arwen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86679</link>
		<dc:creator>Arwen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86679</guid>
		<description>You know I was thinking about this very thing the other day when I was adding links to Amazon books on my site. To disclose or not disclose.

In the end, I decided that it really was a non-issue because first of all, all the products I would recommend are ones that I have personally used and feel would be beneficial for others.

Secondly, prior to this I had read a post by Steve Pavlina that talked about people who begrudge the fact that you are making money from your blog/website. Basically he said that all they want to do is abuse you by taking everything you are giving without you receiving anything in return.

These people are to be avoided because all they will do is suck you dry and generally make you regret the day you thought to help other people.

It really does come down to a matter of trust as you point out. As long as your audience trusts you and knows that you have their best interests at heart than there is nothing wrong with using an affiliate link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I was thinking about this very thing the other day when I was adding links to Amazon books on my site. To disclose or not disclose.</p>
<p>In the end, I decided that it really was a non-issue because first of all, all the products I would recommend are ones that I have personally used and feel would be beneficial for others.</p>
<p>Secondly, prior to this I had read a post by Steve Pavlina that talked about people who begrudge the fact that you are making money from your blog/website. Basically he said that all they want to do is abuse you by taking everything you are giving without you receiving anything in return.</p>
<p>These people are to be avoided because all they will do is suck you dry and generally make you regret the day you thought to help other people.</p>
<p>It really does come down to a matter of trust as you point out. As long as your audience trusts you and knows that you have their best interests at heart than there is nothing wrong with using an affiliate link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86619</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86619</guid>
		<description>@ Eric - There is no good reason for people to not like it when a blogger earns money using a method that never compromises content. There is a difference between being influenced and being a total whore about it. The problem is that it&#039;s a slippery slope from one to the other, and before they know it, a lot of bloggers find themselves at the bottom. 

The difference between affiliate links and paid text links is that it&#039;s quite easy to control what affiliate programs will be promoted vs. automatic paid link scripts which nearly always link to junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Eric &#8211; There is no good reason for people to not like it when a blogger earns money using a method that never compromises content. There is a difference between being influenced and being a total whore about it. The problem is that it&#8217;s a slippery slope from one to the other, and before they know it, a lot of bloggers find themselves at the bottom. </p>
<p>The difference between affiliate links and paid text links is that it&#8217;s quite easy to control what affiliate programs will be promoted vs. automatic paid link scripts which nearly always link to junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86605</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86605</guid>
		<description>For some reason, people don&#039;t like it when bloggers earn money this way.  I&#039;ve read some books about blogging and they all take about full disclosure.  Maybe people just think bloggers are supposed to completely uninfluenced by third party companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, people don&#8217;t like it when bloggers earn money this way.  I&#8217;ve read some books about blogging and they all take about full disclosure.  Maybe people just think bloggers are supposed to completely uninfluenced by third party companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86328</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86328</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I would probably disclose it just to avoid the perception that I was trying to â€œget one overâ€ on my readers by slipping in an affiliate link under the guise that I had nothing to gain whatsoever.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

See, that&#039;s what I&#039;m talking about: why does that perception exist? How is it a deception? Who told anyone that to do otherwise was a deception? That&#039;s just mis-conceived thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I would probably disclose it just to avoid the perception that I was trying to â€œget one overâ€ on my readers by slipping in an affiliate link under the guise that I had nothing to gain whatsoever.</p></blockquote>
<p>See, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m talking about: why does that perception exist? How is it a deception? Who told anyone that to do otherwise was a deception? That&#8217;s just mis-conceived thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine OKelly</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86321</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine OKelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86321</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any problem with people putting in affiliate links without disclosing it.  For me personally, with the exception of Amazon, I would probably disclose it just to avoid the perception that I was trying to &quot;get one over&quot; on my readers by slipping in an affiliate link under the guise that I had nothing to gain whatsoever.  

I like to support my fellow bloggers by purchasing things through affiliate links.   I&#039;m not sure why anyone would have a problem with that?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any problem with people putting in affiliate links without disclosing it.  For me personally, with the exception of Amazon, I would probably disclose it just to avoid the perception that I was trying to &#8220;get one over&#8221; on my readers by slipping in an affiliate link under the guise that I had nothing to gain whatsoever.  </p>
<p>I like to support my fellow bloggers by purchasing things through affiliate links.   I&#8217;m not sure why anyone would have a problem with that?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen JL</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86311</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen JL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86311</guid>
		<description>Thanks Michael. 

Yes, increasing my readership is the main focus now. I don&#039;t plan on adding any affiliate programs for quite a while.

And I&#039;m in Teaching Sells also...so there&#039;s other plans too :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michael. </p>
<p>Yes, increasing my readership is the main focus now. I don&#8217;t plan on adding any affiliate programs for quite a while.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m in Teaching Sells also&#8230;so there&#8217;s other plans too <img src='http://remarkablogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Helps</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86309</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Helps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86309</guid>
		<description>&gt; Why have affiliate links become associated with abusing the trust of your readers?

Also perhaps the greed of the companies that try affiliate links to pull in customers to sub-standard products and services. I know a lot of quality products and services can be purchased through affiliate links, but as you say it&#039;s up to the integrity of the blogger to steer his/her readers to only the quality affiliates, not the rubbish that may pay a higher/larger commission.

And Steven has a good point too - if you don&#039;t disclose and your readers notice anyhow, they may see a perceived conflict of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Why have affiliate links become associated with abusing the trust of your readers?</p>
<p>Also perhaps the greed of the companies that try affiliate links to pull in customers to sub-standard products and services. I know a lot of quality products and services can be purchased through affiliate links, but as you say it&#8217;s up to the integrity of the blogger to steer his/her readers to only the quality affiliates, not the rubbish that may pay a higher/larger commission.</p>
<p>And Steven has a good point too &#8211; if you don&#8217;t disclose and your readers notice anyhow, they may see a perceived conflict of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/comment-page-1/#comment-86306</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://remarkablogger.com/2008/02/25/blogging-ethics-101c-disclosure-manifesto/#comment-86306</guid>
		<description>@ Karen - If your audience trusts you and you are behaving in a trustworthy manner, revealing the existence of such links will not hurt that. But neither will not revealing them, because the trust isn&#039;t based on whether or not you make money from those links. Undisclosed affiliate links are not an automatic violation of trust.

If you just can&#039;t see it that way, then do what you feel is right, and your audience will respect you for that.

All I will say in addition to that is that if what you say about your market is true, then you most certainly stand to benefit from affiliate sales. But getting your traffic up will help a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Karen &#8211; If your audience trusts you and you are behaving in a trustworthy manner, revealing the existence of such links will not hurt that. But neither will not revealing them, because the trust isn&#8217;t based on whether or not you make money from those links. Undisclosed affiliate links are not an automatic violation of trust.</p>
<p>If you just can&#8217;t see it that way, then do what you feel is right, and your audience will respect you for that.</p>
<p>All I will say in addition to that is that if what you say about your market is true, then you most certainly stand to benefit from affiliate sales. But getting your traffic up will help a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
