<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex appeal in web design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://remarkablogger.com/2005/08/09/sex-appeal-in-web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2005/08/09/sex-appeal-in-web-design/</link>
	<description>Blog Coaching &#38; Consulting Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:48:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne DiVita</title>
		<link>http://remarkablogger.com/2005/08/09/sex-appeal-in-web-design/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne DiVita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.remarkablogger.com/2005/08/09/sex-appeal-in-web-design/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Michael, excellent review piece. To help out here&#039;s a link to a site for women&#039;s cosmetics that, I think, reflects women far better than Loreal. http://www.avon.com/

If you look at Bed, Bath and Beyond (which I reviewed last week, btw) http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/ you&#039;ll see that it&#039;s clearly female-friendly. 

Also, the stats, although posted on Tom Peters&#039; blog, come from the Center for Women&#039;s Business Research (I quote them, often.) http://www.nfwbo.org/topfacts.html  

Thanks for the link. I&#039;m adding yours to my blogroll. Keep writing. I like it, I like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, excellent review piece. To help out here&#8217;s a link to a site for women&#8217;s cosmetics that, I think, reflects women far better than Loreal. <a href="http://www.avon.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.avon.com/</a></p>
<p>If you look at Bed, Bath and Beyond (which I reviewed last week, btw) <a href="http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bedbathandbeyond.com/</a> you&#8217;ll see that it&#8217;s clearly female-friendly. </p>
<p>Also, the stats, although posted on Tom Peters&#8217; blog, come from the Center for Women&#8217;s Business Research (I quote them, often.) <a href="http://www.nfwbo.org/topfacts.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nfwbo.org/topfacts.html</a>  </p>
<p>Thanks for the link. I&#8217;m adding yours to my blogroll. Keep writing. I like it, I like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
